It's not really Monday. |
This is a combination post. I thought I’d be writing an It’s
Monday! post, but it somehow turned into Wednesday before I noticed. I also
thought I’d write a review of The Forgotten Girls by Sarah Blaedel, but I’m
still too furious to deal with it. So this is going to be a bookish stir-fry –
a little protein, a little vegetable, and a splash of sauce.
Last week I read Citizen: An American Lyric by Claudia
Rankine, and that slim book aroused all of my political sensibilities. Over the
weekend, I thought I’d turn down the volume and read a light mystery/thriller. I
chose The Forgotten Girls because it had been well-reviewed elsewhere, and I
love a good missing persons storyline.
As it turns out, once my political fire is ignited, there’s
no way back. I finished The Forgotten Girls on Sunday, and I’m still gnashing my teeth.
If I had written this review at the half-way point of the
book, I would have said the following: this is a fun, somewhat predictable
Danish police procedural. Louise is the independent, sassy detective recently
assigned to lead a Missing Persons Unit. She is joined by Eik, a handsome but
unreliable detective side kick. They tackle a case that involves an unidentified
woman in the woods -- and of course, nothing good happens in the woods. The story
grows to include a sinister old mental institution, creepy woods-dwelling
people, and some connections to other murders.
So far, so good. But then! THEN! It turns out that there’s a
plot line in this book that steers pretty close to asserting the idea that men
are biologically wired to be violent toward women. And as much as I never turn
to thrillers for feminism, I found this development so distasteful and
irresponsible that I almost threw it across the room.
I thought I would go on and on about my outrage over this
issue, but now that I’m in front of the computer, I don’t have anything more to
say about it. We are better than that, even if we live deep in the backwoods of Denmark.
In other news, there is a teachers’ strike in Seattle, so
summer continues for the youths in my house. Their presence is interfering with
my back-to-school read: Purity by Jonathan Franzen! I was so excited when this
arrived for me at the library last weekend. The bad news is that it is nearly
600 pages, with tiny font and few chapter breaks.
Of course, you might be ready to point out that Franzen is
no stranger to sexism (though, presumably, he doesn’t live in the woods). The
author of a recent Bustle magazine article writes, “Misogyny seems to
follow him like a cloud; even if you don't know about his exploits, you catch a
whiff of them when he passes by.”
There is an ongoing conversation about
whether a reader needs to like/approve of an author in order to enjoy/purchase
a book. I’ll let you know what I think as I progress through the novel.
Hope you’re having a great week,
internetters! Oh, and if you’re a Danish sleuth, I have a small piece of
advice: if you know that a madman is on the loose in the woods, don’t go out
into the woods! Go have a delicious pastry instead.
1 comment:
I've avoided the Scandinavian mysteries, because the few I've tried have been so dark and violent that I gave up on them pretty quickly. A plot development like the one you describe would turn me off a book completely.
I'll be curious to see what you think of Purity. I've read lots about it, but only one actual review (on NPR).
Post a Comment