We read Weightless by Sarah Bannan for my book club this
month. Though it has literary authors’ blurbs on the cover (Colum McCann!),
this struck me as YA. I do wonder, however, if teen readers would find this too
much like an after school special (Message: Bullying is BAD!) to really enjoy
it.
Here’s the premise: a gorgeous, mysterious new girl shows up
at a high school in an insular town. At first, she is admired, but soon her
peers begin to turn on her in terrible ways. The torment is relentless, and it
escalates. The girl also has a troubled back story, so it is up to the reader
to figure out whether bullying is causing or contributing to the character’s
struggle.
Speaking of the reader, this book’s narrator is a “we.” The
reader learns that the “we” is comprised is a specific group of girls who are
bystanders and witnesses to the bullying. The plural narrator allows the reader
to be a part of a group that does not step in to help, the kind of group that
participates by being and staying silent. However, this strategy pulled me away
from the story. I like to slip into the lives of characters, and the “we” gave
me too much distance. I stayed separate from what should have been a very
emotional experience.
One of our book club members pointed us to Sticks and Stones
by Emily Bazelon, which is a nonfiction exploration of bullying. I didn’t read this
whole thing, but I did read the part that featured the real case that inspired
Weightless (but don't click the link to the real case if you don't want spoilers for Weightless). Bazelon’s narration of that story focused on the idea of
culpability – can bullying be considered the cause of a victim’s behavior (say,
if s/he commits an act of violence)? Part of the mystery of bullying is that
it’s hard to pin down – what’s the difference between teasing and bullying
(bullying is sustained intimidation – but who decides what intimidation is)?
And there’s a growing literature about girl bullying (I liked this one), which tends to be less
physical than most cases of boy bullying, but also less definable. If you snub
someone repeatedly, is that bullying? Is exclusion bullying?
The biggest problem I had with Weightless is that the story
was so deeply and obviously a case of teens being cruel and adults turning away
from what was happening. Everything was so awful and so blatant and so terrible
that there wasn’t really anything to wrestle with or consider. Was everyone
responsible for what happened? Yes. Case closed. I would have been more likely
to connect with a book that presented a less flashy case with more dimension.
One book club member raised the issue of the existence of
grown-up bullies, and that got me thinking about whether and how Mean Adults
are portrayed in literature. Do you have any good examples of books about Mean
Women or Mean Men?
( This one doesn’t count).
2 comments:
I'm not a fan of books about bullying--I get mad at the mean characters and don't like that I can't do anything about what's going on. And books written from the "we" POV are definitely different to read. I've only read one book written in that collective voice, and I thought it was interesting, but at the same time I was really glad the book was short so I didn't have to stay with that "we" voice for too long.
I agree about the "we." I think The Virgin Suicides by Eugenides is the only other book I've read with that point of view.
Post a Comment